<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daniel Craig wears a Rolex to Honor the Legacy of James Bond.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/daniel-craig-wears-a-rolex-to-honor-the-legacy-of-james-bond/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/daniel-craig-wears-a-rolex-to-honor-the-legacy-of-james-bond</link>
	<description>Rolex in the Media, Events, Celebrity, Events, Lifestyle, Ex-Presidents, &#38;  in culture. Post your comments on the Rolex Watch Blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/daniel-craig-wears-a-rolex-to-honor-the-legacy-of-james-bond/comment-page-1#comment-8322</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/?p=55#comment-8322</guid>
		<description>I'd just like to point out that in the GQ interview Daniel Craig is listed as wearing a "watch by Rolex, Craig's own" however in the accompanying photo (shown above) Craig is in fact wearing an Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean on a rubber strap. Perhaps this was a mistake on behalf of the editor?? Apart from that a great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to point out that in the GQ interview Daniel Craig is listed as wearing a &#8220;watch by Rolex, Craig&#8217;s own&#8221; however in the accompanying photo (shown above) Craig is in fact wearing an Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean on a rubber strap. Perhaps this was a mistake on behalf of the editor?? Apart from that a great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucifer Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/daniel-craig-wears-a-rolex-to-honor-the-legacy-of-james-bond/comment-page-1#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucifer Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/?p=55#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>Flemming's Bond wore a Rolex Oyster Perpetual (with a metal band) because it was heavy and chunky and made a very good knuckle-duster (OHMSS Chpts 15&amp;16).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flemming&#8217;s Bond wore a Rolex Oyster Perpetual (with a metal band) because it was heavy and chunky and made a very good knuckle-duster (OHMSS Chpts 15&amp;16).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: top gambling list</title>
		<link>http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/daniel-craig-wears-a-rolex-to-honor-the-legacy-of-james-bond/comment-page-1#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>top gambling list</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/?p=55#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to post such a detailed and informative article. It has given me a lot of inspiration and I look forward to more like this in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to post such a detailed and informative article. It has given me a lot of inspiration and I look forward to more like this in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/daniel-craig-wears-a-rolex-to-honor-the-legacy-of-james-bond/comment-page-1#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melrosejewelers.com/rolex-watch-blog/?p=55#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Daniel made a mistake in the reference number of his Rolex. It is "6538", not 6358. Rolex never made a 6358 in the Submariner line or in any other line.

Respectfully,

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel made a mistake in the reference number of his Rolex. It is &#8220;6538&#8243;, not 6358. Rolex never made a 6358 in the Submariner line or in any other line.</p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
